But as it always goes on the internet when something becomes popular, there are an army of critics there to tell everyone why they're wrong to support Invisible Children. The arguments can be summarized in this link everyone is using.
Here's the problem with everyone bashing Invisible Children right now: IC's main goal is raise awareness. Which they've done. Better than I've seen in a really long time. A lot of people went to sleep last night with no idea who Joseph Kony is. Today, everyone's talking about him - demanding action. He is becoming a household name.
I want to get away from this, though, because by focusing so much on the integrity of Invisible Children, we are completely shifting the focus away from what should matter - the horrible atrocities being committed by Kony. The people putting so much focus on the "legitimacy" of IC are simply proving that they care more about talking
One of the articles criticizing Invisible Children ended with a series of (mostly sarcastic) questions about IC but this one stood out: "Is [this] all just pompous hypothesizing by Westerners with enough freedom, information, and education to look down on a simple, kind act?" To which I have to answer, yes.
No comments:
Post a Comment